Cox v. State
Citations
- 43 Tex. 101
Syllabus
<p>1. Continuance.—Confinement in jail, and a want of information as to the requirements of law, afford no excuse for failing to use diligence in procuring the attendance of a witness, and constitute -no cause for the continuance of a case.</p> <p>2. Theft, proof of ownership.—Where one person has the general and another the special property in the thing stolen, the indictment may allege the property to be in either.</p> <p>3. Theft.—When property is stolen in one county and carried by the thief into another, the taking may be charged to have occurred in either.</p>
Judges: Reeves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- Bagley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- Gaines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Jinks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Fore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Roth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
- Lowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1926-04-07
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.