Skip to main content

Cox v. State

Citations

  • 764 So. 2d 711
  • 2000 WL 775584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the State was required to prove the site of the drug sale was a school when the offense took place and evidence that it was a school two years earlier was insufficient
  • holding the State was required to prove the site of the drug sale was a school when the offense took place and evidence that it was a school two years earlier was insufficient
  • reversing for entry of judgment of acquittal on sale within 1,000 feet of school where competent, substantial evidence did not show location was school at time of offense
  • reversing a conviction for sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and remanding with directions to enter judgment for the lesser included offense of sale of cocaine
  • reversing conviction under section 893.13(l)(c), Florida Statutes, because “the state failed to prove an essential element of the charged offense, i.e., that the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of a school”
  • reversing the defendant’s conviction for sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school where the sole evidence that the facility was a school was an officer’s testimony that he saw children playing outside the building with adults present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joanos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.