Cox v. Quigley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When it is clear that documents would have been prepared independent of any anticipation of use in litigation (ie. because some other purpose or obligation was sufficient to cause them to be prepared) no work product protection can attach.”
• “When it is clear that documents would have been prepared independent of any anticipation of use in litigation (i.e., because some other purpose or obligation was sufficient to cause them to be prepared), no work product protection can attach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).