· 5/23/2001
Cox v. Polk County
Citations
- 25 P.3d 970
- 174 Or. App. 332
- 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 757
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that LUBA has such discretion
- “Amicus Oregon Farm Bureau Federation contends that the proposed project is not a farm use under ORS 215.203. However, the parties to this case do not assign error to LUBA’s conclusion that the project is a farm use. Accordingly, we do not address that question.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.