Skip to main content
· 5/23/2001

Cox v. Polk County

Citations

  • 25 P.3d 970
  • 174 Or. App. 332
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that LUBA has such discretion
  • “Amicus Oregon Farm Bureau Federation contends that the proposed project is not a farm use under ORS 215.203. However, the parties to this case do not assign error to LUBA’s conclusion that the project is a farm use. Accordingly, we do not address that question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.