Cox v. Illinois Central Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an injury was particular to the plaintiff where “the plaintiff [was] himself among the injured and not simply someone who retained] a special interest in the injury”
• taking USCA11 Case: 21-12540 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 02/09/2023 Page: 9 of 46 21-12540 Opinion of the Court 9 judicial notice of map, provided by town at court’s request, which showed that 45.5% of town’s land (40.11 square miles
• “Article III standing is not based on a determination of the merits of any of Plaintiff’s substantive claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).