Cox v. Hozelock, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the General Assembly had intended to use the term ‘agricultural products,’ it would have done so.”
• when a legislative body “uses two different terms in the same act, it is presumed to mean two different things”
• “When the General Assembly uses two different terms in the same act, it is presumed to mean two different things.”
• “When the General Assembly uses two different terms in the same act, it is presumed to mean two different things.”
• ‘When the General Assembly uses two different terms in the same act, it is presumed to mean two different things.”
• Department of Taxation’s interpretation of tax laws “is entitled to great weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).