Cox v. HOWARD, WEIL, LABOUISSE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting, but not requiring, the “trial court to set forth specific reasons and findings prefatory to entering a Rule 54(b) judgment”
• suggesting, but not requiring, the “trial court to set forth specific reasons and findings prefatory to entering a Rule 54(b) judgment”
• “In complex litigation involving multiple claims or multiple parties, or both, Rule 54(b) is helpful because it allows judges to efficiently and fairly resolve separable claims before protracted litigation is finally resolved.”
• “In complex litigation involving multiple claims or multiple parties, or both, Rule 54(b) is helpful because it allows judges to efficiently and fairly resolve separable claims before protracted litigation is finally resolved.”
• “In complex litigation involving multiple claims or multiple parties, or both, Rule 54(b) is helpful because it allows judges to efficiently and fairly resolve separable claims before protracted litigation is finally resolved.”
• “Rule 54(b) judgments must be reserved for rare and special occasions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).