Cox v. Gaffney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government’s written response to Willis “[did] not amount to the Secretary taking a position represented by counsel during the administrative phase of Willis’ disability claim”
• explaining that a decision becomes “final” only “after the Appeals Council renders its decision”
• explaining that finality is comprised of two elements— presentation and exhaustion
• awarding EAJA attorney’s fees for counsel’s work performed during the administrative proceedings after the district court’s remand of [claimant’s] disability claims pursuant to Hudson
• “A claimant, with each claim she brings for an unadjudicated time period, is entitled to a de novo review of the medical evidence.”
• in objecting to a report and recommendation, “making some objections but failing to raise others will not preserve all the objections a party may have”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).