· 10/12/1813
Cox v. Fenwick
Citations
- 6 Ky. 183
- 3 Bibb 183
- 1813 Ky. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that because of “the difficulty a plaintiff faces in knowing the type of calling system used without the benefit of discovery . . . courts can rely on details about the call to infer the use of an ATDS” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Owsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.