Skip to main content
· 10/12/1813

Cox v. Fenwick

Citations

  • 6 Ky. 183
  • 3 Bibb 183
  • 1813 Ky. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that because of “the difficulty a plaintiff faces in knowing the type of calling system used without the benefit of discovery . . . courts can rely on details about the call to infer the use of an ATDS” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owsley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.