Cox v. Felice Perri & Sons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[b]y the procedure adopted, clearly and patently erroneous, Perri’s counsel was precluded from contradicting by testimony the facts averred in the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Linett v. Linett
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-05-28· cited 53×
• Goldstein v. Graduate Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-07· cited 41×
• Saint Vladimir Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 30×
• Valley Peat & Humus v. Sunnylands, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-05· cited 28×
• Kophazy v. Kophazy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-11· cited 20×
• Elcomp, Inc. v. Drolet
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-25· cited 14×
• Hershey v. Segro
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-28· cited 13×
• Williams v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-07· cited 9×
• Whatley v. Baynard
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-04-22· cited 7×
• Ungate v. Passalacqua
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-07· cited 7×
• Products Corp. of America v. Madway Engineers & Constructors
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-15· cited 6×
• Anthos v. Nu Aero Corp.
  Chester County Court of Common Pleas· 1965-01-12
• Ellwood Consumer Discount Co. v. Agostino
  Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 1966-03-03

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mazer v. Sargent Electric Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-04-17· cited 30×
• Lipshutz v. Plawa
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-05-02· cited 12×