Skip to main content
· 2/23/1954

Cox v. District Court

Citations

  • 129 Colo. 99
  • 267 P.2d 656
  • 1954 Colo. LEXIS 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A ‘preponderance of the evidence . . .’ simply requires that the evidence show a rational factfinder that a particular fact is more likely than not.”
  • “a party is free to contend on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict even if the party failed to move for a directed verdict, a j.n.o.v., or new trial in the trial court.”
  • “[A] party who movedfor a directed verdict as to a specific claim will be entitled to judgment as a matter of law on that claim if [it] prevails on [its] argument on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict as to that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.