Cox v. Decoteau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[o]ne should not be able to avoid a tax on shoes by calling shoes slippers” (alteration in original) (internal quotation omitted)
• “[o]ne should not be able to avoid a tax on shoes by calling shoes slippers” (alteration in original) (internal quotation omitted)
• when the language of a statute is clear, it is assumed to express legislative intent
• challenging the applicability of pawnbroker statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).