Cox v. Commonwealth Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in the detailed, 29-page Notice would alert even a careful reader that he must satisfy the exclusion requirements or suffer the consequence of permitting his ongoing litigation to evaporate.”
• “[N]o reasonable person could view their conduct as expressing a desire to participate in the proposed settlement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).