Cox v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[a] 30-day suspension of 24 telephone privileges related to disciplinary action does not amount to a First Amendment 25 violation”
• “Plaintiff’s complaint is completely devoid of any factual allegations that 19 the … Defendants had an agreement or ‘meeting of the minds’ to conspire to 20 violate Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”
• “To make out a prima facie case of retaliation, the plaintiff has the burden of showing that retaliation 15 for the exercise of a protected right was the but-for factor behind the defendant’s conduct.”
• “To make out a 14 prima facie case of retaliation, the plaintiff has the burden of showing that retaliation for 15 the exercise of a protected right was the but-for factor behind the defendant’s conduct.”
• “To make out a prima facie case 16 of retaliation, the plaintiff has the burden of showing that retaliation for the exercise of a 17 protected right was the but-for factor behind the defendant’s conduct.”
• United States Attorney General is 13 immune

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).