· 10/18/1983
Cox Cable Cleveland Area, Inc. v. King
Citations
- 582 F. Supp. 376
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12647
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that lost cash flow to cable operators adversely affects their ability to purchase and maintain a higher quality of programming services for their subscribers
- noting that lost cash flow to cable operators adversely affects their ability to purchase and maintain a higher quality of programming services for their subscribers
- “Congress and the Courts have recognized and protected Cox's interest in cable television communications”
- “Congress and the Courts have recognized and protected Cox’s interest in cable television communications”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.