Skip to main content
· 10/18/1983

Cox Cable Cleveland Area, Inc. v. King

Citations

  • 582 F. Supp. 376
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that lost cash flow to cable operators adversely affects their ability to purchase and maintain a higher quality of programming services for their subscribers
  • noting that lost cash flow to cable operators adversely affects their ability to purchase and maintain a higher quality of programming services for their subscribers
  • “Congress and the Courts have recognized and protected Cox's interest in cable television communications”
  • “Congress and the Courts have recognized and protected Cox’s interest in cable television communications”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.