Texas Supreme Court· 4/30/1958
Cowling v. Colligan
Citations
- 312 S.W.2d 943
- 158 Tex. 458
- 1 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 395
- 1958 Tex. LEXIS 559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that change in conditions is affirmative defense that must be specifically pleaded and proved
- noting that court may refuse to enforce restriction when there has been waiver of right to enforce
- stating that in deciding restrictive covenant case, court’s “judgment must arise out of a balancing of equities or of relative hardships”
- stating that in deciding restrictive covenant case, court’s “judgment must arise out of a balancing of equities or of relative hardships”
- stating that in deciding restrictive covenant case, court = s A judgment must arise out of a balancing of equities or of relative hardships @
- rendering judgment that covenant restricting use to residence purposes prohibited use of the tract for business and commercial purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calvert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martin v. Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 255×
- Jim Rutherford Investment Inc. v. Terramar Beach Community Ass'nTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-08-03· cited 134×
- Newman v. KingTexas Supreme Court· 1968-05-08· cited 110×
- TX Far West, Ltd. v. Texas Investments Management, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-03-11· cited 84×
- Ski Masters of Texas, LLC v. HeinemeyerTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-08-29· cited 80×
- Voice of Cornerstone Church Corp. v. Pizza Property PartnersTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-03-10· cited 62×
- Asociación de Vecinos de Villa Caparra, Inc. v. Iglesia CatólicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1986-05-08· cited 54×
- Pebble Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. ShererTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-04-28· cited 49×
- Giles v. CardenasTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-04-17· cited 49×
- Traweek v. LarkinTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1986-04-30· cited 46×
- Marino v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 44×
- Uptegraph v. Sandalwood Civic ClubTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-02-05· cited 43×
- Tanglewood Homes Ass'n, Inc. v. HenkeTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1987-01-22· cited 43×
- Oldfield v. City of HoustonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-05-04· cited 38×
- Dempsey v. Apache Shores Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-08-12· cited 37×
- Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1960-09-09· cited 36×
- Dr. Saung Zin Park v. Escalera Ranch Owners' Association, Inc. and Rostrata Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-02-13· cited 36×
- Stephenson v. PerlitzCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-04-22· cited 32×
- Healy v. Wick Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-15· cited 29×
- Mea v. MeaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-01-21· cited 29×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court· 1952-05-07· cited 102×
- Scaling v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1942-11-27· cited 28×
- Faubian v. BuschCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-03-12· cited 25×
- Terrell Hills Baptist Church v. PawelCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-01-04· cited 13×
- Mechling v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1930-05-13· cited 13×
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1950-12-06· cited 10×
- Cowling v. ColliganCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-11-21· cited 6×
Other cases named Cowling v. Colligan
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.