Skip to main content
· 11/5/1992

Cowin & Co. v. Medina

Citations

  • 860 P.2d 535
  • 16 Brief Times Rptr. 1728
  • 1992 Colo. App. LEXIS 401
  • 1992 WL 318481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that if an employee has established entitlement to compensation and there was no evidence of a non-occupational disease, then the default position would be no apportionment; the employer must therefore show the existence of a non-industrial disease for apportionment to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Criswell, Jones, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.