Skip to main content
· 11/6/1937

Cowan v. George W. Kerford Quarry Co.

Citations

  • 146 Kan. 682
  • 72 P.2d 999
  • 1937 Kan. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding writ of attachment void because process issuing writ unconstitutional
  • holding writ of attachment void because process issuing writ unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.