Skip to main content
· 2/20/1899

Covington v. Kentucky

Citations

  • 173 U.S. 231
  • 19 S. Ct. 383
  • 43 L. Ed. 679
  • 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1434

Syllabus

<p>This court is bound by the construction put by the highest court of the State of Kentucky upon its statutes, referred to in the opinion of the court, relating to exemptions from taxation of property used for “ public purposes,” however much it may doubt the soundness of the interpretation.</p> <p>The provision in the act of the legislature of Kentucky of May 1, 1886, c. 897, that “the said reservoir or reservoirs, machinery, pipes, mains and appurtenances, with the land on which they are situated,” which the city of Covington was, by that act, authorized to acquire and construct, “shall be and remain forever exempt from state, county and city tax,” did not, in view of the provision in the act of February 14,1856, that “ all ' charters and grants of or to corporations, or amendments thereof, and all other statutes, shall be subject to amendment or repesjJ at the will of the legislature, unless a contrary intent shall be therein plainly expressed,” which was in force at the time of the passage of the act of May 1, 1886, tie the hands of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, so that it could not, by legislation, withdraw such exemption, and subject the property to taxation.</p> <p>Before a statute — particularly one relating to taxation — should be held to be irrepealable, or not subject to amendment, an intent not to repeal or amend must be so directly and unmistakably expressed as to leave no room for doubt; and it is not so expressed when the existence of the intent arises only from inference or conjecture.</p> <p>A municipal corporation is a public instrumentality, established to aid in the administration of the affairs of the State, and neither its charters, nor any legislative act regulating the use of property held by it for governmental or public purposes, is a contract within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States: and if the legislature, choose to subject to taxation property held by a municipal corporation ofNthe State for public purposes, the valid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even assuming that city is performing a private function, the Contract Clause afforded it no protection
  • even assuming that city is performing a private function, the Contract Clause afforded it no protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.