Covenant Media of South Carolina, LLC v. City of North Charleston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had suffered an injury sufficient to establish standing where an unconstitutional application of law created a claim \redressable at least by nominal damages\
• holding that invoking the term “facial challenge” “does not provide [a litigant] a passport to explore the constitutionality of every provision of the Sign Regulation”
• concluding that the plaintiff's facial challenge to the sign regulation failed because the regulation was content neutral and \did not need time limitations on decisionmaking to be constitutional\
• holding that billboard company’s standing to chal- lenge the permit procedure “does not provide it with a pass- port to explore the constitutionality of every provision of the Sign Regulation”
• holding that the standing analysis must not be confused with the merits of a case because “[a] plaintiffs standing to bring a case does not depend upon his ultimate success on the merits underlying his case”
• holding that the standing analysis must not be confused with a determination of the merits because “[a] plaintiff’s standing to bring a case does not depend upon his ultimate success on the merits underlying his case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).