· 1/29/2003
Covanta Onondaga Limited Partnership v. Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency
Citations
- 318 F.3d 392
- 288 B.R. 392
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1410
- 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 216
- 2003 WL 193073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a court “does not get to dictate to other courts the preclusion consequences of its own judgment”
- “If the remand order is not appealable, . . . then it is highly unlikely that the order has preclusive effect.”
- “[A] court that has concluded its adjudication of the merits of a case within its jurisdiction by entering a final judgment retains authority to take action with respect to some collateral matters related to the case, such as attorney’s fees and costs . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Sack, Sotomayor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.