Couts v. Spivey

Citations

• 66 Tex. 267
• 17 S.W. 540
• 1886 Tex. LEXIS 499

Syllabus

<p>1. Landlord’s lien—Article 3122s, Revised Statutes, construed—0. rented a storehouse to B., and B. sub-let the premises to H.; H. gave his notes to B. for the rent, and B. transferred them to 0. Held., Under art 3122a, R. S., there would be no landlord’s lien if H.’s tenancy was from month to month, and the notes were for rent for months after the termination of the tenancy. In such case, the notes would not be for rent due or to become due. (Assn v. Cochran, 60 Tex., 620.)</p> <p>2. Same—Evidence—See opinion for evidence held insufficient to establish a landlord’s lien.</p>