Cousin v. Lensing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the prison mailbox rule does not extend to prisoners who are represented by counsel or to submissions filed on a prisoner’s behalf by a “non-attorney intermediary”
• finding “mere attorney error or neglect is not an extraordinary circumstance such that equitable tolling is justified.”
• mere attorney error or neglect is not an extraordinary circumstance such that equitable tolling is justified
• petitioner’s guilty pleas became final at the end of the period for filing a notice of appeal under La. Code Crim. P. art. 914
• “[P]risoners are not entitled to counsel during habeas proceedings and thus cannot state a claim for ineffective assistance during those proceedings.”
• petitioner’s guilty pleas became final at the end of the period for filing a notice of appeal under La. Code Crim. P. art. 914

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).