Skip to main content
· 8/16/1985

Courtney v. Ryan Homes, Inc.

Citations

  • 497 A.2d 938
  • 345 Pa. Super. 109
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “trial court’s dictum ... does not establish the law of the case”
  • affirming trial court refusal to strike or open judgment on the basis that the complaint and confession of judgment were (Footnote Continued
  • affirming trial court refusal to strike or open judgment on the basis that the complaint and confession of judgment were combined in one document rather than entered separately, and noting that due notice had been provided under the terms of the confession clause
  • plaintiff filed a complaint in confession of judgment and judgment confessed pursuant to the warrant of attorney contained in the note
  • “Amortgage and an accompanying note are separate obligations,” and “[t]he note is evidence of the debt; and the mortgage provides collateral security for the debt.”
  • courts are not instituted to render advisory opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Wieand, Lederer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.