Skip to main content
· 12/9/1986

Courtney v. Rutledge

Citations

  • 351 S.E.2d 419
  • 177 W. Va. 232
  • 1986 W. Va. LEXIS 608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is nothing in the record to indicate that the appellant was given ‘prior written warning’ that a mistake during a technical project would result in termination of his employment although he was told on numerous occasions, in writing, that certain other behavior would do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.