· 9/18/2014
Courtney v. Hon. foster/courtney
Citations
- 235 Ariz. 613
- 334 P.3d 1272
- 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a court has “inherent authority to modify its own order”
- observing that statutes are interpreted using the plain language of the statute as the best indicator of the intent of the drafter
- observing that statutes are interpreted using the plain language of the statute as the best indicator of the intent of the drafter
- recognizing “the primacy of [A.R.S.] § 25-403.03(F) in parenting time decisions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maurice, Portley, Samuel, Thumma
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.