Skip to main content
· 9/18/2014

Courtney v. Hon. foster/courtney

Citations

  • 235 Ariz. 613
  • 334 P.3d 1272
  • 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a court has “inherent authority to modify its own order”
  • observing that statutes are interpreted using the plain language of the statute as the best indicator of the intent of the drafter
  • observing that statutes are interpreted using the plain language of the statute as the best indicator of the intent of the drafter
  • recognizing “the primacy of [A.R.S.] § 25-403.03(F) in parenting time decisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maurice, Portley, Samuel, Thumma

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.