Skip to main content
· 3/14/1983

Courier-Citizen Company v. Boston Electrotypers Union No. 11, International Printing & Graphic Communications Union of North America

Citations

  • 702 F.2d 273
  • 112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3122
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that limitations on arbitrator's post award authority rested on court's hostility toward arbitration as dispute resolution mechanism
  • explaining that “[c]ourts have generally refused to rule on the precedential effect of an arbitration award on future awards, taking the position that the question is properly resolved through arbitration”
  • arbitrator allowed to explain remedy sketched out in award, because situation unlike cases where \arbitrator issued a second award fundamentally inconsistent with the first award.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Campbell, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.