Couret v. Hopkins-Rhodes & Co.
Citations
- 13 Tiess. 161
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>If property is sold burdened with non-apparent servitudes, without any declaration having been made thereof to the buyer, and if the servitudes be of such importance that there is cause to presume that the buyer would not have purchased, if he had been aware of the encumbrances, he may claim tile cancelling of his contract and a return of the deposit he • had made.</p> <p>An agent to sell who receives from a buyer a deposit which he pays over to his principal, may recover it from his principal when he is condemned to return it to the buyer.</p> <p>Judgment in favor of plaintiff affirmed; judgment in favor of warrantor reversed.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the filing requirement under section 4140(a) is jurisdictional and therefore not subject to equitable tolling
- holding that the filing requirement under section 4140(a) is jurisdictional and therefore not subject to equitable tolling
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Claiborne, Honor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.