County of San Luis Obispo v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the stalking statute does not prohibit conduct that is protected expression under the First Amendment
• stating that the stalking statute does not prohibit conduct that is protected expression under the First Amendment
• holding that Georgia stalking statute was not overbroad
• stating that the statute defines “harass” as “a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes emotional distress by placing such person in reasonable fear of death of bodily harm to himself or herself or to a member of his or her immediate family_”
• stating that the statute defines \harass\ as \a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes emotional distress by placing such person in reasonable fear of death of bodily harm to himself or herself or to a member of his or her immediate family ....\
• “To ‘contact’ is readily understood by people of ordinary intelligence as meaning ‘to get in touch with; communicate with.’” (quoting American Heritage Dictionary (3d ed. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).