County of San Diego v. San Diego NORML

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating county lacks standing to raise constitutional infirmities of state medical marijuana laws except to the extent the laws require it to take specific action
• county has no standing to raise hypothetical constitutional infirmities of a statute when statute did not cause it injury
• “Because [Section 903] preserves state laws except where there exists such a positive conflict that the two laws cannot consistently stand together, the implied conflict analysis of obstacle preemption appears beyond the intended scope of [Section 903].” (emphases omitted)
• “Because [Section 903] preserves state laws except where there exists such a positive conflict that the two laws cannot consistently stand together, the implied conflict analysis of obstacle preemption appears beyond the intended scope of [Section 903].” (emphases omitted)
• upholding California medical 6 marijuana law against preemption challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).