County of Maui v. Puamana Management Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no definition of hotel usage in the ordinance and it is hotel usage that this case is all about.”
• \There is no definition of hotel usage in the ordinance and it is hotel usage that this case is all about.\
• even though organized short term rentals of condominium units had attributes of a hotel, it did not have all the attributes of a hotel as defined in the ordinance
• even though organized short term rentals of condominium units had attributes of a hotel, it did not have all the attributes of a hotel as defined in the ordinance
• county’s position that a renter must manifest an intent to make a condominium unit his permanent home in order for it to be considered a residential use was “on its face, absurd”
• Clearly, the units in question do not fall within the definition of hotel in the ordinance because it is obvious from the pleadings that Puamana does not consist of a single building.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).