County of Maui v. Baskin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s comparator was invalid despite both being state troopers because they held different ranks and handled their mis- conduct differently
• holding that plaintiff’s comparator was invalid despite both being state troopers because they held different ranks and handled their mis- conduct differently
• noting that two police officers were not similarly situated in all material respects, in part because they held different ranks
• “Issues not raised in an initial brief are deemed forfeited and will not be addressed absent extraordinary circumstances.”
• “[U]nsubstantiated assertions alone are not enough to withstand a motion for summary judgment.” (quoting Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525, 1529 (11th Cir. 1987)); see also Hooker v. Fournier, 29 F. App’x 641, 643 (2d Cir. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).