County of Maricopa v. Paysnoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the county’s argument that two contiguous lots owned by the same condemnee but used differently must nevertheless be valued as a single parcel for purposes of calculating severance damages inflicted on each lot
• rejecting the county’s argument that two contiguous lots owned by the same condemnee but used differently must nevertheless be valued as a single parcel for purposes of calculating severance damages inflicted on each lot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).