Skip to main content
· 6/22/2010

County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.

Citations

  • 233 P.3d 1169
  • 224 Ariz. 590
  • 585 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence sufficient where customer had previously made and performed on oral commitment, and reached terms with plaintiff’s successor and a similar company
  • stating an appellate court will only reverse a due process error if it prejudiced a party
  • plaintiffs must “provide a basis for estimating loss that [does] 20 not rest upon ‘conjecture or speculation’” (internal citation omitted)
  • “Because lost future profits are capable of proof approaching mathematical precision, the requirement of ‘reasonable certainty’ must be applied with added force to such damages.”
  • “Waiver may be inferred from a party's actions that are inconsistent with intent to assert a right.”
  • “Generally, three remedies are available for a breach of contract: 26 rescission, continued performance, or termination and damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timmer, Swann, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.