· 6/22/2010
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.
Citations
- 233 P.3d 1169
- 224 Ariz. 590
- 585 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
- 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding evidence sufficient where customer had previously made and performed on oral commitment, and reached terms with plaintiff’s successor and a similar company
- stating an appellate court will only reverse a due process error if it prejudiced a party
- plaintiffs must “provide a basis for estimating loss that [does] 20 not rest upon ‘conjecture or speculation’” (internal citation omitted)
- “Because lost future profits are capable of proof approaching mathematical precision, the requirement of ‘reasonable certainty’ must be applied with added force to such damages.”
- “Waiver may be inferred from a party's actions that are inconsistent with intent to assert a right.”
- “Generally, three remedies are available for a breach of contract: 26 rescission, continued performance, or termination and damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timmer, Swann, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.