County of Hamilton v. Thomsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[n]o rule of constitutional interpretation is violated by a legislative provision declaring retroactively a procedural method of recovery upon an existing substantive right. Such a provision may be retroactive in its application”
• stating the times during which a mandate cannot issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).