Skip to main content
· 1/22/1960

County of Du Page v. Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co.

Citations

  • 165 N.E.2d 310
  • 18 Ill. 2d 479
  • 1960 Ill. LEXIS 279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the ordinary concept of use, as applied in determining the existence of a nonconforming use, must yield to the realities of the business in question and the nature of its operations”
  • holding that “the ordinary concept of use, as applied in determining the existence of a nonconforming use, must yield to the realities of the business in question and the nature of its operations”
  • noting that gravel extraction businesses “cannot operate over an entire tract at once”
  • excavation allowed to continue on entire plot, since plot had been devoted to excavation as evidenced by numerous switch tracks, although stone had not yet been removed from all portions of the land
  • mining started 25 years after certificate was issued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William J. Bauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.