County of Brevard v. Miorelli Engineering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding sovereign immunity barred suit even though contractual relationship existed because specific breach alleged was based on work outside of terms of contract
• holding claim for “[f]raud in the inducement causing only economic loss” was barred under doctrine of sovereign immunity because it did not “fit within any of those categories of injury or loss enumerated in the statute”
• stating “that there first be an express written contract before there can be a waiver of sovereign immunity”
• approving of Fourth District decision interpreting Pan-Am to apply only to breaches of express contracts and express or implied conditions of those express contracts
• “[E]very contract includes an implied covenant that the parties will perform in good faith.”
• “[E]very contract includes an implied covenant that the parties will perform in good faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).