County of Berks Ex Rel. Baldwin v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “we now hold that where this [C]ourt has issued an order without opinion denying extraordinary relief, that order alone is insufficient to establish that there has been a full and final adjudication of the claims raised”
• where appellant failed to identify what life, liberty or property interest had been deprived by PLRB determination, due process claim failed
• where appellant failed to identify what life, liberty or property interest had been deprived by PLRB determination, due process claim failed
• “It is axiomatic that in order for ... res judicata to apply, the issue or issues must have been actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment.”
• “It is axiomatic that in order for . . . res judicata to apply, the issue or issues must have been actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment.”
• “[F]urthermore, the PLRB could accept the County’s contention that all members of the bargaining unit are managerial and/or confidential employees who are precluded from joining any bargaining unit under [Public Employee Relations Act (PERA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).