County of Bedford v. City of Bedford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court properly dismissed a § 1962(c) claim because the defendant persons were not distinct from the alleged enterprises
• stating section 1962(e) “envisions the enterprise as ‘being different from, not the same as or part of; the person.’” (citation omitted)
• counseling against a “mechanical checklist” approach to 19 determining whether a defendant’s contacts were “substantial and continuous”
• court did not err in considering document referred to in complaint in granting motion to dismiss
• “If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the 19 || opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint 20 || into dismissal of the entire action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).