Skip to main content
· 3/10/1993

County Banking & Trust Co. v. Kempner (In Re Kempner)

Citations

  • 152 B.R. 37
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3974
  • 1993 WL 88730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the Bankruptcy Court’s statements on the record sufficiently explained the Court’s rationale “so as to provide meaningful appellate review of the Bankruptcy Court’s order”
  • oral orders that sufficiently explain rationale of denial of motion provide for meaningful appellate review and do not violate the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 7052

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Latchum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.