Counts v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the performance of nonexempt work for five or six weeks out of every eighteen months could not alter the plaintiffs’ exempt status”
• “[I]n order to be exempt from overtime pay requirements, an employee must be paid on a salaried rather than hourly basis . . . .”
• “It is clear from this language [in 29 C.F.R. §§ 541.103, 541.206 (2003)] that primary duty is meant to be assessed by the totality of the circumstances. ”
• proposal requiring regular periodic reevaluation of an employee’s exemption status is “untena- ble”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).