Skip to main content
· 8/29/2008

Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. v. Hammes

Citations

  • 892 N.E.2d 683
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 1959
  • 2008 WL 3982879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party opposing summary judgment could rely on entire deposition where movant “designated the entire deposition and later in a different filing identified specific pages”
  • affirming the trial court’s denial of the terminal’s motion for summary judgment because there was an issue of material fact as to breach of duty
  • “A party may not take advantage of an error that he commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of his own neglect or misconduct.”
  • “negligence cases are especially fact sensitive and are governed by a standard of the objective reasonable person—one best applied by a jury after hearing all of the evidence.”
  • “negli-­‐‑ gence cases are especially fact sensitive and are governed by a standard of the objective reasonable person—one best applied by a jury after hearing all of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Baker, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.