Country Mutual Insurance v. Hagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an intent to injure is not inferred when the abuser is also a minor
• holding that an intent to injure is not inferred when the abuser is also a minor
• holding that a court determining whether the intentional-injury exclusion applies for sexual abuse should not infer intent when the perpetrator is also a minor because of “minors’ relative lack of experience in sexual matters”
• reasoning that extending a blanket presumption of intent to all minor perpetrators, will lead to absurd results in some cases
• reasoning that extending a blanket presumption of intent to all minor perpetrators, will lead to absurd results in some cases
• negligence count of the complaint was within the coverage of the policy because the insured did not expect or intend the injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).