Skip to main content
· 4/2/1996

Council Rock School District v. Richard N.

Citations

  • 920 F. Supp. 84
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4094
  • 1996 WL 164450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[mjistake of counsel or ignorance of the rules of procedure usually does not suffice to establish good cause”
  • noting that timely calls to corporate headquarters or the Secretary of State to inquire as to the proper agent for service of process could indicate due diligence
  • noting that timely calls to corporate headquarters or the Secretary of State to inquire as to the proper agent for service of process could indicate due diligence
  • arguing that “Rule 4(i)(A) allows service to be proper [by] (i) deliver[ing] a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United States attorney for the district where the action is brought” (second alteration in original)
  • granting motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process under Rule 4(h)(1) when the plaintiff served an individual corporate representative not authorized to receive service of process
  • “While the purpose of service is to give a defendant notice of the claims against it, notice alone cannot cure an otherwise defective service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.