Council of Insurance Agents + Brokers v. Viken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment in favor of the Council’s challenge to South Dakota’s countersignature laws
• “The countersignature laws and the discrimination practiced do not bear a substantial relationship to any legitimate objectives of South Dakota.”
• nonresident insurance agents and producers licensed in South Dakota have a fundamental right COUNCIL OF INS. AGENTS v. MOLASKY-ARMAN 3713 or privilege to place insurance on terms of substantial equality with licensed resident agents
• noting less restrictive means available to advance South Dakota’s goals
• noting less restrictive means available to advance South Dakota’s goals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).