· 12/23/2011
Council for Urological Interes v. Kathleen Sebelius
Citations
- 399 U.S. App. D.C. 159
- 668 F.3d 704
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25658
- 2011 WL 6450767
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying no-review exception because association of doctor- owned equipment providers could not bring any challenge whatsoever to Medicare rules through the administrative process and no parties eligible to bring such a challenge had a sufficient interest to do so
- Congress may use, inter alia, “specific language” to indicate its intent to foreclose review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Sentelle, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.