Skip to main content
· 12/23/2011

Council for Urological Interes v. Kathleen Sebelius

Citations

  • 399 U.S. App. D.C. 159
  • 668 F.3d 704
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25658
  • 2011 WL 6450767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying no-review exception because association of doctor- owned equipment providers could not bring any challenge whatsoever to Medicare rules through the administrative process and no parties eligible to bring such a challenge had a sufficient interest to do so
  • Congress may use, inter alia, “specific language” to indicate its intent to foreclose review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Sentelle, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.