Coulter v. Renshaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• damages for loss of spouse’s monthly income recoverable; damages for loss of consortium, i.e., loss of -7- companionship, felicity, and sexual intercourse, not recoverable
• “[W]e hold that merely pleading loss of the spouse’s services without an allegation of actual pecuniary loss is insufficient to establish actual damage.”
• “[Mjerely pleading loss of the spouse’s services without an allegation of actual pecuniary loss is insufficient to establish actual damage.”
• damages for loss of spouse’s monthly income recoverable; damages for loss of consortium, i.e., loss of companionship, felicity, and sexual intercourse, not recoverable
• “We-think the elements of loss of consortium are the kinds of indefinitely measured damages for which the legislature intended to preclude recovery when it adopted the Alienation of Affections Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).