Skip to main content
· 12/16/2013

Coughlin v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 833
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 692
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3365
  • 571 U.S. 1113
  • 2013 WL 6027924
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 9081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, if a subset of legislators was barred from voting, members of the subset “could claim a personal injury”
  • explaining that an individual legislator may represent the body as an institution upon authorization
  • recognizing the injury in Coleman as an injury suffered in the legislators' official capacity
  • noting that “individual legislators may not support standing by alleging only an institutional injury”
  • “Describing the injury in Coleman as ‘institutional’ is difficult to square with the definition of an institutional injury provided in Arizona.”
  • defining an “institutional injury” as one that “impacts all members . . . in equal measure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.