Skip to main content
· 3/28/1994

Coughlin v. Barker Avenue Associates

Citations

  • 202 A.D.2d 622
  • 609 N.Y.S.2d 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Pinkerton because there was no arbitration provision agreed to by the parties applicable to the claims arising from the promissory note at issue
  • “Points that include more than one issue are multifarious and preserve nothing for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.