· 8/2/2000
Coufal Abogados Eric Coufal v. At&t, Inc. Lucent Technologies Inc.,defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 223 F.3d 932
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6410
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8549
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that New York did not have a significant interest 12 in applying its law because no activities relevant to the cause of action occurred in the state and its 13 interest in the litigation was limited to regulating a New York corporation’s conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Fletcher, Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.